Google Transparency
We want Google to provide a "one-stop" site where users can opt out of tracking across the company's platforms.
</don't be evil bullshit>
USE THE ALTERNATIVE SEARCH ENGINE LIKE https://startpage.com
An Alternative History of Silicon Valley Disruption
2018 STUDY REVIVES DEBATE ABOUT GOOGLE'S ROLE IN FILTER BUBBLES
Finding #1: Most people saw results unique to them, even when
logged out and in private browsing mode.
Finding #2: Google included links for some participants that it did
not include for others.
Finding #3: We saw significant variation within the News and Videos
infoboxes.
Finding #4: Private browsing mode and being logged out of Google
offered almost zero filter bubble protection.
a new
study from DuckDuckGo
, a Google rival, found that users saw very different results when
searching for terms such as “gun control,” “immigration,” and
“vaccinations,” even after controlling for time and location. One
participant saw a National Rifle Association video at the top of the
results page for “gun control,” another saw Wikipedia at the top,
while a third got the
NRA
video but no result from Wikipedia in any of the first 10 links.
Over the years, there has been considerable discussion of Google's
"filter bubble" problem.
Put simply, it's the manipulation of your search results based
on your personal data. In practice this means links are moved up
or down or added to your Google search results, necessitating
the filtering of other search results altogether.
These editorialized results are informed by the personal information
Google has on you (like your search, browsing, and purchase
history), and puts you in a bubble based on what Google's algorithms
think you're most likely to click on. The filter bubble is
particularly pernicious when searching for political topics. That's
because undecided and inquisitive voters turn to search engines to
conduct basic research on candidates and issues in the critical time
when they are forming their opinions on them.
2017 Google, democracy and the truth about internet search
An anecdote that I don't think has ever been shared: Google once allowed schools to force students into an unencrypted version of its search engine for filtering (through DNS). The Iranian government used this technique to remove search privacy for the entire country! ~ Collin Anderson @CDA
CONGRESS NEEDS TO ARREST Larry Page and Sergey Brin FOR PROMOTING
HATE SPEECH USING autocomplete suggestions as part of their racist
algorhthyms. and received the following response:
“Our search results are a reflection of the content across the web.
This means that sometimes unpleasant portrayals of sensitive subject
matter online can affect what search results appear for a given
query. These results don't reflect Google's own opinions or beliefs
- as a company, we strongly value a diversity of perspectives, ideas
and cultures.”
the power and reach of these companies is only now seeping into the public consciousness.
Rebecca MacKinnon, director of the Ranking Digital Rights project at the New America Foundation, whether it was the recent furore over fake news that woke people up to the danger of ceding our rights as citizens to corporations.
Jonathan Albright , found 23,000 pages and 1.3m hyperlinks. “And Facebook is just the amplification device. When you look at it in 3D, it actually looks like a virus. And Facebook was just one of the hosts for the virus that helps it spread faster.
This is the equivalent of going into a library and asking a
librarian about Judaism and being handed 10 books of hate. “I
thought they stopped offering autocomplete suggestions for religions
in 2011.” ~ Danny Sullivan
Tech-savvy rightwingers have been able to 'game' the algorithms of
internet giants and create a new reality where Hitler is a good guy,
Jews are evil and… Donald Trump becomes president.
Since 2008, Google has attempted to predict what question you might
be asking and offers you a choice. And this is what it did. It
offered me a choice of potential questions it thought I might want
to ask: “are jews a race?”, “are jews white?”, “are jews
christians?”, and finally, “are jews evil?”
This was Google's question. And this was Google's answer: Jews are
evil. Because there, on my screen, was the proof: an entire page of
results, nine out of 10 of which “confirm” this. The top result,
from a site called Listovative, has the headline: “Top 10 Major
Reasons Why People Hate Jews.” I click on it: “Jews today have taken
over marketing, militia, medicinal, technological, media,
industrial, cinema challenges etc and continue to face the worlds
[sic] envy through unexplained success stories given their
inglorious past and vermin like repression all over Europe.”
3/9/16 Google moved more than 10.7 billion euros ($11.7 billion)
in international revenues to a Bermuda mailbox in 2014 through a
series of tax structures known as a
"Double Irish" and a "Dutch sandwich,
" the most recent year for which figures are available.
Doing so saved Alphabet Inc., Google's parent company, some $2.4
billion in worldwide taxes that year, regulatory filings show.
https://archive.is/vKx0q
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-09/deutsche-bank-ubs-lose-bonus-tax-dispute-at-u-k-supreme-court-ilko7hcq
Malta "the Panama of Europe".
2017
The Maltese prime minister's chief of staff and a prominent minister
held secret companies in Panama. The corporate tax system was
sanctioned by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) and is in line with the EU's freedom of
establishment. The government has been under siege since the Panama
Papers revealed details of secret companies in Panama. Those
revelations have cast doubt on its ability to push through
anti-money laundering legislation. The so-called Individual Investor
Programme scheme, which enabled Malta to raise millions by selling
its passports to rich foreigners, is at the centre of an inquiry,
after Mr Busuttil claimed he had evidence to prove the prime
minister's chief of staff was receiving kickbacks off the scheme.
1/30/14 Malta has bowed to EU pressure over its controversial new
passport scheme for non-EU nationals, saying applicants will now be
required to spend at least a year in Malta in order to qualify. The
new condition was announced by Malta in a joint statement with the
European Commission. Applicants will still have to invest at least
1.15m euros (£944,000; $1.57m) in Malta to get a passport.
On May 19, a network of journalists released their findings after
digging into more than 150,000 documents. Describing them as the
"Malta Files", the group said they showed how international
companies were taking advantage of the Maltese tax system. They also
claimed Malta had become a target for firms linked to the Italian
mafia and Russian loan sharks.
Malta currently holds the presidency of the European Union, so the
allegations are all the more sensitive. And they come at the tail
end of a bitter election campaign that has seen the island's Labour
government fending off serious claims of corruption, ahead of a vote
on 3 June. What makes Malta so attractive? Malta operates a tax
system where companies pay the lowest tax on profits in the EU.
While local businesses must pay 35% on profits, international
corporations profit from a corporation tax rate of as little as 5%,
thanks to a complex system where shareholders can receive a tax
refund of up to six-sevenths of their tax paid in Malta. The average
rate in the EU is around 22%. Several EU countries say such a system
damages their budgets and reveals a weakness in the EU, which allows
the 28 member states sovereign rights over their taxation. According
to a report commissioned by Green MEPs in the European Parliament,
Malta helped multinationals avoid paying €14bn (£12bn;$15.6bn) in
taxes between 2012 and 2015, which would have gone to other EU
countries.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40026826
Your Google Maps Timeline stores a year's worth of information about the routes you've traveled. Did you mean to give up all that data? People respond more favorably to targeted ads when they have the ability to control their privacy settings. But do we feel that we have that control? We want to control our personal data and how it is used. Retailers can also track us through the partner apps on the phone.
GOOGLE IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMS
the intersection point between US global power and social media -
Eric Schmidt might not have been an emissary of Google alone.
Whether officially or not, he had been keeping some company that
placed him very close to Washington, DC, including a well-documented
relationship with President Obama. Not only had Hillary Clinton's
people known that
Eric Schmidt
's partner had visited me, but they had also elected to use her as a
back channel. While WikiLeaks had been deeply involved in publishing
the inner archive of the US State Department, the US State
Department had, in effect, snuck into the WikiLeaks command center
and hit me up for a free lunch. Two years later, in the wake of his
early 2013 visits to China, North Korea, and Burma, it would come to
be appreciated that the chairman of Google might be conducting, in
one way or another, “back-channel diplomacy” for Washington. The
last forty years has seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and
political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to
execute political agendas by proxy. A toxic piñata of attendees: US
officials, telecom magnates, security consultants, finance
capitalists, and foreign-policy tech vultures like Alec Ross
(Cohen's twin at the State Department).33 At the hard core are the
arms contractors and career military: active US Cyber Command
chieftains, and even the admiral responsible for all US military
operations in Latin America from 2006 to 2009. Tying up the package
are
Jared Cohen and the chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt.
What Happens to Your Data?
What about Privacy for K12 Students?
Your Photos Might Be Getting Uploaded On Google Without Your Knowledge
WHAT GOOGLE
KNOWS ABOUT YOU
What Does Google Store About Me?
To help make the whole process more transparent, Google has unveiled another product in its vast empire: Google Dashboard. Dashboard is a helpful tracker that sums up the information Google has collected about your profile in one place. To view your Google Dashboard, visit http://google.com/dashboard. You will need to re-enter your password even if you are currently signed in to a Google account.
Here's how to opt-out of Google's third-party email address lists
ad targeting service
You can do this by switching off "Ads based on your interests" on
the Google ad settings page (for logged-in Google users) at:
https://www.google.com/settings/ads
you direct control over how your interests are (or are not) used
when displaying ads via Google-associated sites. Turn off
interest-based ad preferences, this will also turn off the use of
these third-party email address lists for your logged in account.
4/15/15 All sent and received e-mails in Gmail will be analyzed , says Google The new text might be a reaction to the e-mail scanning lawsuit. E-mail users brought the lawsuit against Google in 2013, alleging that the company was violating wiretapping laws by scanning the content of e-mails. The plaintiffs' complaints vary, but some of the cases include people who sent their e-mails to Gmail users from non-Gmail accounts and nonetheless had their content scanned.
opting out
and taking control
Opting out and taking control
- The Google provides detailed information about how each type of data is used along with links to opt out of any specific areas .
- Google's Activity controls page for a simple single-page list of on-off toggles.
- Clean up your history for anything that Google has been tracking: click the three-dot icon in its upper-right corner and choosing Delete
- Android device open the main system settings and selecting Google (or, if you're on an older device, looking for the standalone Google Settings app) and then tapping "Personal info & privacy."
-
How to erase your online History
.
#Alexa and #Google Home Records What You Say.
A full history of your voice commands with any Google product -- including actual audio recordings go to Voice and Audio Section of My Activity
Turn off location services
Go ahead, says
Google, we'll still track you
Why does Google Play need constant GPS anyway?
This article may be confusing two technologies. It is highly likely
that no GPS, cell-tower, of Wi-Fi SSID location service at all was
involve when when the mentioned researcher walked into a McDonalds
an his phone prompted him to download a Mickey-D's App. Rather,
Google, and others, are encouraging companies to deploy Bluetooth
based "beacons" in their stores. The location those beacons is fixed
and known. Phones listen to the beacon signals. Each beacon is
named. The phone contacts Google or Apple to resolve the beacon's
name into an action, such as prompting the user to download a store
app. This of course, means that your location is known, and is
provided to Google (or Apple or ..), but the location information
comes from proximity to the beacon, not from any GPS or cell-tower
based location service. (This is not to say that these beacons could
form yet another source of location information for the location
services in the phone.)
Google has access to NHS patient data.
Apparently that deal does not have regulatory approval - and
Google says such approval is not necessary.
“Under section 251 of the NHS Act 2006, sharing identifiable health
data requires the consent of patients whose data is being shared.
Where that consent cannot reasonably be given in practice - in large
research projects, for example - those handling the data must go
through an ethical approval process via the Confidentiality Advisory
Group that culminates with consent being given on patients' behalf
by the UK Secretary of State for Health - currently Jeremy Hunt.
DeepMind does not appear in the Health Research Authority database
of approved applications, which is updated every two weeks. Google
has said that its activities are not bound by such a requirement
since patient consent for what it is doing is implied.” It seems to
me that for some things you should not settle for “implied.”
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2088056-exclusive-googles-nhs-deal/
HALF OF ALL CLASSROOM COMPUTERS ARE NOW CHROMEBOOKS a complaint filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Google has been “collecting and data mining school children's personal information, including their Internet searches,” which is not only creepy, but also contrary to previous promises. “Despite publicly promising not to,” the EFF noted , “ Google mines students' browsing data and other information , and uses it for the company's own purposes.” EFF FILES FTC COMPLAINT
12/1/15 Google Leads In Misleading Privacy
Here's the problem... it is completely and utterly misleading. When
I dug deeper into the policies it was found that as long as Google
doesn't personally identify you,
Google can share with advertisers 100% of your digital activity
, connect it with the places you visit and the purchases you make in
the real world. Oh, and sorry you cannot opt out. Check out
Google's privacy page
and their
ads settings
The EFF's complaint is based upon their examination of both Google's
Chromebook and Google Apps for Education, a collection of
educational software that numerous schools throughout the U.S. use.
According to the watchdog group, “While Google does not use student
data for targeted advertising within a subset of Google sites,
EFF complaint
found that Google's 'Sync' feature for the Chrome browser is enabled
by default on Chromebooks sold to schools.” Google has previously
been tripped up by signing industry pledges, which are legally
binding in the U.S. In 2012, Google paid $22.5 million to settle a
Federal Trade Commission complaint that it misrepresented how it
tracked Web users with cookies, or small lines of software code.
Google Begins Allowing Marketers to Target Advertising Using
Email Addresses
For example, say a consumer shares her email address with a clothing
retailer when purchasing items in-store. The retailer can then
upload that address to Google to identify her when she's using
Google search or YouTube, and to target search or video ads to her
for similar or complementary products, provided she signed in to
Google with the same email address. By tapping into email addresses,
as both Facebook and Twitter do with their own respective products,
Google can take higher cuts of the more costly and better targeted
ads being served even from within the Gmail and YouTube apps on
mobile devices. Google calls Customer Match a “privacy-safe”
product, but that may not quell the concern of users who feel that
advertisers are getting even more specific with their ad targeting.
11/16/14
Google's secret NSA alliance
:
The terrifying deals between Silicon Valley and the security state.
Inside the high-level, complicated deals -- and the rise of a
virtually unchecked surveillance power
In mid-December 2009, engineers at Google's headquarters in Mountain
View, California, began to suspect that hackers in China had
obtained access to private Gmail accounts, including those used by
Chinese human rights activists opposed to the government in Beijing.
Like a lot of large, well-known Internet companies, Google and its
users were frequently targeted by cyber spies and criminals. But
when the engineers looked more closely, they discovered that this
was no ordinary hacking campaign.
8/4/14 Google scans your emails for child porn and reports to law enforcement when it finds same. Google flagged images of child abuse found in his GMail account to authorities, according to reports, revealing that the search giant is quietly but methodically watching our email activity for illegal images.
THE POLITICIANS
SET POLICY
Google has cleverly planted dozens of their people in White House , Downing St, other governments. Most brilliant new lobbying effort yet. ~ Rupert Murdoch
Google's security team gives firms 90 days to fix flaws before they go public. Unless you complain to Google's CEO.
Facebook and Google Have to Open Up - Bloomberg Quint
The WPP boss has railed against the opacity of Facebook and Google
for years, calling for independent checks on the effectiveness of
advertising on the sites. So when Facebook said on Thursday that it
had overestimated the average viewing time for video ads on the
social network for the past two years, the veteran ad man was proven
right. This matters because big brands are pouring ad dollars
online, with nearly half of spending going to Google and Facebook
alone -- as the chart below shows. Not only do the likes of Unilever
and P&G want to make sure their dollars aren't going to waste,
they want to know they're reaching the right people.
3/19/15 Details from an FTC investigation into Google on anti-trust accusations have emerged, suggesting the search giant specifically worked to keep competitors out of its top results. Google was deliberately blacklisting competing shopping sites.
Google Analytics Unique Visitor
language. Visitors are now users
.
Usually, the new and returning visitor reports are reporting on how
many sessions are a new visitor versus a returning visitor. You
might just want to think of the vocabulary instead of New Visitor
and Return Visitor, as "Session with a new user" and "Session with a
return user."
The BBC has published a list of stories removed from Google's search results because of the “right to be forgotten”. It'll be updated regularly. Neil McIntosh was careful to note in his blog that the BBC does not know, or publish details about who requested the story be removed on Google.”
Google public policy - changing-our-privacy-policies-
We still won't sell your personal information
TO ADVERTISERS
" is an interestingly specific claim. Would you be willing to
provide more information about the organizations with which Google
DOES share our information?
Specifically, who are the "affiliated companies" and "other trusted
businesses" your refer to in the information sharing section of your
privacy policy? Have any of them provided compensation to Google in
return for access to our data? And what, exactly, in a "legal
process or enforceable governmental request"? How does it differ
from an actual cort order?
ALGORITHMS
Google Algorithm Change History
Each year, Google changes its search algorithm around 500-600 times.
While most of these changes are minor, Google occasionally rolls out
a "major" algorithmic update (such as Google Panda and Google
Penguin) that affects search results in significant ways. For search
marketers, knowing the dates of these Google updates can help
explain changes in rankings and organic website traffic and
ultimately improve search engine optimization. Below, we've listed
the major algorithmic changes that have had the biggest impact on
search.
PATENTS
Google has now upgraded its patent search
The new
Google Patents
helps users find non-patent prior art by cataloguing it, using the
same scheme that applies to patents. We've trained a machine
classification model to classify everything found in
Google Scholar
using
Cooperative Patent Classification
codes. Now users can search for “
autonomous vehicles
” or “
email encryption
” and find prior art across patents, technical journals, scientific
books,
and more
.
We've also simplified the interface, giving users one location for
all patent-related searching and intuitive search fields. And thanks
to
Google Translate
, users can search for foreign patent documents using English
keywords. May 2015
on the PTO's Patent Quality Initiative, we hope this tool will
make patent examination more efficient and help stop bad patents
from issuing which would be good for innovation and benefit the
public.
Need To Know: Mean life span of high-profile Google projects: 4 years
Google's Transparency Report
2013 Google's Transparency Report
, which lists the Internet sites receiving the most notices from
studios, trade associations and software and game publishers to
remove copyrighted works. Whenever an ad appears on one of these
leading pirate sites, the lab uses software to obtain the name of
the ad network. The list of ad networks includes Openx, a Pasadena
company that was backed by AOL Ventures and describes itself as a
leader in digital and mobile ad technology; Google and its
advertising platform, DoubleClick; Yahoo and its ad exchange, Right
Media; and Quantcast, a San Francisco firm that also places ads on
sites owned by such major media companies as NBCUniversal and ...
href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/viacom-inc.-ORCRP016274.topic
Viacom
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-piracy-ads-20130102,0,2960606.story
http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/computing-information-technology-industry/aol-llc-ORCRP0000017154.topic
2013 Google+ is Google - There's No Avoiding Google+
Google began requiring people who want to post their reviews of
restaurants or other businesses to use their Google+ profiles to do
so. The same rule applies for reviews of smartphone software "apps,"
as well as physical goods, obtained through Google. Links to Google+
also appear in Google search-engine results involving people and
brands that have set up a Google+ account. Both Facebook and Google
make the vast bulk of their revenue from selling ads. But Facebook
has something Google wants: Facebook can tie people's online
activities to their real names, and it also knows who those people's
friends are. Marketers say Google has told them that closer
integration of Google+ across its many properties will allow Google
to obtain this kind of information and target people with more
relevant (and therefore, more profitable) ads.Users' Google+ profile
pages typically include their real names, and they can add other
details such as their hometowns. By default, the page is public and
will turn up in a Google search. It is possible, however, to change
a setting so that the page doesn't show up in search results. There
is also a way for people to disable or delete their Google+
accounts.
Google derives about 95% of its more than $40 billion in annual
revenue, excluding its new Motorola phone-making unit,
"click-through rates"—the rates at which Google search users click
on ads—have increased for his clients' ads when they include
information from Google+, such as the number of people who have
recommended a brand by clicking the +1 button on the brand's Google+
page. "In the majority of cases, lift in click-through rates ranged
from 2% to 15%," he says.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324731304578193781852024980.html
2012
Google sees 'alarming' level of government censorship
.
Web giant says that in the past six months it received more than
1,000 requests from government officials for the removal of content.
It complied with more than half of them.
Google has revealed it removed about 640 videos from YouTube
that allegedly promoted terrorism over the second half of 2011 after
complaints from the UK's Association of Chief Police Officers. The
news was contained in its latest Transparency Report which discloses
requests by international authorities to remove or hand over
material.
Paul Alan Levy -- plevy@citizen.org
Public Citizen Litigation Group 1600 - 20th Street, NW
(202) 588-1000
http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=396
"
Google, Facebook and blocking offensive content
9/1412
Readers might be interested in this comparison of recent content
removals or blocking by Facebook and Google, and discussion of some
of the implicated policies.
Two voluntary takedowns of user-generated have been in the news
lately, spurring some reflections, on the one hand, about the
dangers of becoming overly dependent on certain platforms for free
expression, and about how online service providers exercise their
discretion under section 230 to remove material even though the
providers cannot be held legally responsible for the hosting.
Rep. Mary Bono Mack
(R-Calif.) chairwoman of the Energy and Commerce Committee's
Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade subcommittee, has jurisdiction
over data privacy issues. Concern over the users' ability to control
the information they share with Google. "The concern of Congress is
how much active participation does a user have to do to protect
their own privacy," she said.
In accordance with the US Secure Flight rules, the Google CRS for Cape Air must also have a bi-directional connection to the US Transportation Security Administration to send passenger data to the TSA and receive permission-to-board (”cleared”) fly/no-fly messages in response. This is, so far as we can tell, an unprecedented level of direct connection between Google's databases and any government agency. Has Google complied with EU law? Probably not, but we can't tell. We invite Google to allow independent verification of how it has with EU rules. There are also interesting questions about what profiling and dat mining capabilities are built into Google's CRS system. “Legacy” CRSs store PNRs in flat files in which PNRs for different trips by the same traveler can be difficult to link. But a report on the new Google CRS in the online trade journal Tnooz says it “enables … call center agents 'to see customers' history,' including past trips and upcoming flights, 'right in front of them'.”
Google's own Transparency Report
, especially the section that addresses the number of governmental
requests to Google for user data, and its response.
By way of example, between January and June 2011, Google received
5,950 user data requests, covering 11,057 users and/or accounts,
from the U.S. government, and (according to Google's own reporting)
it “fully or partially complied with” 93% of those requests. (The
figures from the
data removal request chart
at are smaller but perhaps more troubling.)
The other concern regarding Google's information collection practice
is that people may not realize how many inbound channels Google has.
Under
Google's current privacy policy
, it maintains separate privacy statements for its standalone
products, including:
+1 Button
Advertising
Advisor
Apps
Blogger
Books
Buzz
Chrome
Chrome Frame
Gears
Google+
Google Music
Google Notebook
Google TV
Google Web Toolkit
Groups
Health
Knol
Location Service in Firefox
Mobile
Moderator
Orkut
Picasa
Postini
Safe Browsing
Sites
Store
Toolbar
Trader
Translator Toolkit
Voice
Wallet
Web Accelerator
Web History
YouTube
The next version of the policy
(the one getting all the attention) no longer explicitly breaks
out the separate products, but nor does it list them to remind
users of the numerous Google products (many not branded as such)
.
It is difficult to accept that Google users are truly providing
informed consent to all of the company's information collection,
given the sheer volume and complexity of the disclosures.
Consumers are asked to trade convenience for personal information
privacy all the time.
The question, though, is how knowingly we are doing so.
When it comes to Google, I am far from convinced that any sizable
portion of its users understand how much of their information,
through how many channels, Google is collecting in exchange for
"convenience."
2010
TYPOSQUATTING Harvard Finds Typos Gives Google 500 Million a Year Typo domains that feature only ads, no other links, have higher click-through and conversion rates, suggesting that the half-billion estimate may be too low. The full study of typosquatting and its implications found no relationship between the difficulty of spelling a word and the prevalence of typo sites, but did determine that "high PPC prices spur typosquatting registrations in the corresponding categories." Still, the study emphasizes "the feasibility of significantly reducing typosquatting" due to its high concentration among specific IDs and servers: nearly 76% of typosquatting sites were registered to the same 10 advertiser IDs.
What Google does with all the data it collects ( pdf )
- Predictive Technology the Cognitive FingerPrint
- Web Monitoring Spys Secrecy and Surveillance Recorded Future
- Other Search Engine Options
TECHNOLOGY / ELECTRONIC FOOTPRINT
-
Google Details Electricity Usage of Its Data Centers
Google released its most closely guarded secrets: how much electricity its enormous computing facilities consume. Approximately 12.5 million watts of Google's 260-million-watt total can be accounted for by searches, the company's bread-and-butter service.
Its data centers continuously drew almost 260 million watts — about a quarter of the output of a nuclear power plant — to run Google searches, YouTube views, Gmail messaging and display ads on all those services around the world. over a billion searches a day and numerous other downloads and queries, and it calculates that the average energy consumption for a typical user is small, about 180 watt-hours a month, or the equivalent of running a 60-watt light bulb for three hours. figures did not include the electricity drawn by the personal computers, tablets and iPhones that use information from Google's data centers. Google also estimated that its total carbon emissions for 2010 were just under 1.5 million metric tons, with most of that attributable to carbon fuels that provide electricity for the data centers. In part because of special arrangements the company has made to purchase electricity from wind farms, Google says that 25 percent of its energy is supplied by renewable fuels, and estimates that it will reach 30 percent in 2011.
tags: google trust, click fraud, page rank, robot exclusion, search, search operators, how to remove personal information, ethics, hacking
Can a machine think?
"You insist that there is something a machine cannot do. If you will
tell me precisely what it is that a machine cannot do, then I can
always make a machine which will do just that" ~ J. von Neumann 1948
Princeton, NJ